A down and dirty discussion of the dissertation proposal [Part I]

Scared of dissertation checklists

Download my dissertation checklist for free

Despite the photo, I like lists. Checking things off my list gives me the sense of accomplishment that helps me keep going. In fact, I doubt if I would have finished my dissertation without my dissertation checklist.

I’ve updated my dissertation checklist, and now you can download it for free (without registering or anything!) here. Just sneak in and grab it in Word format. Customize it for your own needs. This generic checklist includes many of the elements you need in your dissertation proposal. I also preview the elements you’ll need to include in your dissertation manuscript, after you collect and analyze your data.

The dissertation proposal

A large project like a doctoral research project has many moving parts, one of which is the dissertation. In the social sciences, dissertations are typically five or six chapters, plus some front matter (title page, abstract, acknowledgments, table of contents, lists of tables and figures, maybe a list of abbreviations) and some back matter (generally just the list of references and the appendices).

The first three chapters of a typical dissertation comprise the dissertation proposal. In this and three subsequent blog posts, I describe the sections of a dissertation proposal. Part I covers the front matter of your proposal. Part II covers Chapter 1, the introduction to your study. Part III covers Chapter 2, the basis of your justification for the study, also known as the Literature Review. Part IV focuses on Chapter 3, the blueprint for your research project, usually entitled Methodology. My discussion is generic, based on what I usually see in the dissertations I edit. Not all institutions require the same format. Follow your institutional guidelines.

The dissertation proposal: the front matter

The term front matter refers to all the pages that come before the first page of Chapter 1. Different universities require different elements in the front matter. Sometimes institutional guidelines can be quite strict. Other times they are refreshingly flexible. Here are the typical elements I find in the front matter section of a dissertation proposal.

Title page. Typically, the front matter starts with a title page. At the least, the title page provides the title of the study, the author, the degree, the school, and the date. Some of you will have to add the names and titles of your committee members. Follow your institutional guidelines. They may even have a template you can paste into place and customize for your project.

Abstract. The abstract is the overview or summary of the entire study. For your proposal, include one statement to introduce the topic, followed by the research problem and purpose of the study. Don’t include your research questions—later on, you won’t have room. For your proposal, focus on the problem, purpose, participants, and methods, and keep it short: The typical Abstract in a finished dissertation manuscript is no more than 350 words.

Acknowledgments & Dedication. We all want to acknowledge the people who helped move us along our dissertation journey. You can ignore this page for your proposal—in fact, I recommend that you do. Leave a placeholder (the title and a blank page), and fill it in after you’ve finished and received approval your dissertation manuscript. Then you can thank your mother, your mentors, your spouse, whoever helped you along your journey. I love to edit acknowledgments pages—I can hear the relief, gratitude, and profound weariness in the dissertators’ voices as they thank everyone under the sun. I know the feeling. I’d like to thank my cat, Eddie. An optional Dedication page may follow the Acknowledgments page.

The Table of Contents. Next up is usually the Table of Contents. If you don’t know by now, the Table of Contents (fondly known as the TOC) is an outline of your entire paper, usually to three or four levels of subheadings, depending on how your institution treats chapter headings. Some institutions put chapter headings in a class of their own, separate from the other heading and subheadings. Other institutions treat chapter headings as level 1 headings. Whatever. It matters, but not enough to fret about now. You’ll figure it out when your Chair dings you for not having three (or four) heading levels in your TOC. Argh.

A sample Table of Contents

A few dissertators who aren’t afraid of Word styles have figured out that Word can insert an automatic TOC. Most dissertators would probably like that idea, but are terrified of setting up and applying Word styles to their headings, and thus resort to typing their TOCs manually. Oh the humanity. I take a look, cringe, and delete the entire thing, all those pages of spaces, tabs, raggedy page numbers—yep, all gone. Then I proceed to set styles for all those headings and subheadings. I go through the paper, tagging each heading and subheading with the appropriate style. That takes a while, depending on how hard it is to figure out the dissertator’s intentions. Then I insert a TOC, bada boom, it’s done, in about six seconds. That is how you do a TOC.

Every now and then I will edit a paper from some harried dissertator whose institutional guidelines seem hell bent on making it impossible for anyone to get approval. Things in the TOC must line up just so, the k under the j, and indented just this amount, no more and no less. In those rare cases, Word’s automatic TOC feature will only get us partway to the goal. Annoying, but what can we do? I guess we could do some programming in Word, but that’s above my paygrade. Feel free. If the TOC has minute formatting requirements, I insert the TOC, convert it to plain text, and then format it as required, hoping that the dissertator won’t move stuff around and mess up the pagination. That’s a different subject for another day.

To update your TOC, click anywhere in it and press F9 on your function key row, or right-click and choose Update Field. You can update the entire table or just the page numbers.

Lists of Tables and Figures. The Table of Contents is usually followed by the List of Tables and the List of Figures (starting on separate pages). Usually the List of Tables comes first, but actually, I believe the List that should come first is the one that is the longest. Follow your institution’s template.

The magical trick of creating these lists is to use Word’s INSERT CAPTION function. You can insert labels above each table (e.g., Table 1) and below each figure (e.g., Figure 1). Word will generate accurate lists of each. You won’t have to type anything except the table titles and the figure captions. Bada bing. Magic. On rare occasions, I like Word. Making these lists is one of them. To update your list, click anywhere in it and press F9 on your function key row, or right-click and choose Update Field.

List of Abbreviations. Most dissertators don’t include a list of abbreviations, unless they are in the military. Dissertators who are or were in the military usually present an extensive list of acronyms, because that is their common language. If you have a list of abbreviations or acronyms, present it simply and concisely, without definitions. You’ll have a section in Chapter 1 to present your definitions of key terms.

The end of the front matter

When I see the term front matter, for some reason I think of gray matter and then wonder, do I have any left? Uh-oh. Then I think, front matter doesn’t matter, which is just silly—of course, front matter matters, if you are writing a dissertation proposal. How your front matter looks is a huge clue to the quality of the rest of your proposal. For example, if I see that you’ve manually typed your Table of Contents, I know that your comfort level with Word is low. That means I will be on the lookout for other formatting errors, and I will find them. Front matter matters in the sense that this section sets the level of expectation for the three chapters that follow.

The final page of the front matter marks the transition between the preliminary gobble-de-gook (technical term for all that stuff I’ve been talking about) and your actual paper. The front matter prepares your reader (or reviewer) for the proposal that follows. That means you need a dividing line between the two sections. We accomplish this in Word using a section break.

That means, at the end of the final page in your front matter, there should be a NEXT PAGE SECTION BREAK. This is the crucial section break in most dissertations. You can have more, and you may be required to have more, but if the pagination of the front matter changes on page 1 of Chapter 1, you’ll need at least this one section break or you’re a goner. You’ll find this essential section break in the little section break boutique under the PAGE LAYOUT Ribbon.

The section break tells Word that the formatting in section 2 can be different from the formatting in section 1. That’s great, because quite often the page number format changes from lowercase Roman numerals to Arabic numerals, don’t ask me why. If you ever accidentally deleted a section break and cried out in horror as your margins, page numbers, headers, and footers went wonky, you know what I am talking about. Quick, CONTROL Z!

If you can’t see your section breaks, it’s not your eyes. Turn on the “nonprinting characters” by clicking the SHOW/HIDE button on your Home Ribbon. Voila! Suddenly the extent of your crappy keyboarding ability becomes apparent. Yikes! Where did all those extra spaces and tabs come from? Yep. You tried to align things using spaces, didn’t you? Whoopsy.

In the next blog post, I dig deep under the hood of Chapter 1 to reveal the surprising number of essential elements, all of which you will need if you want to get your proposal approved.

 

Print version
kindle version

Why I wrote a book to help you get your dissertation proposal approved

Hi. My name is Carol Booton, sometimes known as Dr. Carol. I was 50 years old when I started my doctoral program at a for-profit online university in December 2005. After eight long years, I earned my doctorate in Business Administration in December 2013. One doctorate doesn’t make me an expert, I know. (How many would, I wonder?) However, I remember the problems I faced trying to get my proposal approved. Now, as an academic editor, I edit other people’s proposals and dissertations and I see the same problems in their proposals that I encountered in mine.

So I wrote a book to help dissertators avoid some of the hurdles I had to overcome. It’s called Resubmit: 28 ½ reasons why you can’t get your dissertation proposal approved. It was published by Crossline Press and you can find it on Amazon. I also have a companion website for the book, at LoveYourDissertation.com, where you can download templates and worksheets in pdf format for free right now. Find out how to get 20% off the book price at the end of this post.

Does it feel like you are all alone?

I attended a doctoral program that was offered completely online. It was convenient, but I had next to no interaction with others in my program. I was alone in my cave the entire time. I had no peers to bounce ideas off of, nobody to puzzle things out with. Even my mentors were not easily accessible or willing to help when I needed feedback. I felt very much alone, especially when I was working on my dissertation proposal.

I spent a long time stuck on my proposal because I didn’t have answers to some basic questions: Should I choose qualitative or quantitative (which one will get me done faster?) How do I choose a theory? What does it mean that my proposal elements are not “aligned”? When should I cite a source? Why does it seem like Microsoft Word is trying to kill me?

Since 2014, in between editing other people’s proposals and dissertations, I’ve had time to ruminate on my doctoral journey and ponder what I could have done differently to make it flow more smoothly (and end sooner). The result of my rumination was this book.

You are alone, but there is help

I’ve written the book I wished I had had when I was sweating over my proposal, watching the clock ticking and thinking, hmmmm, failure is apparently an option after all. I wanted simple, practical advice from someone who had been in my shoes, someone who didn’t throw more academic jargon at me, but shared real stories to give me insight into the obstacles that were holding me back. I wrote the book I didn’t have when I could have really used the help.

Traditional books don’t always help

You probably bought some books when you embarked upon your dissertation journey. Me, too. I needed help to understand the dissertation process and get a sense of the nature of the journey. I wanted to know, was I in for smooth sailing or a raging whirlpool of confusion? The books I found were written for dissertators who attended traditional doctoral programs at traditional universities—none of the advice seemed to apply to my own situation as a nontraditional dissertator.

I also bought books to help me learn how to apply certain research methods. Many of the books I bought are still sitting unread on my shelf. I like to read, but some seemed like gibberish to me—I admit, I’m not a natural mathematical genius. I love statistics, sort of in the way I love rainbows and unicorns. I needed a book written by a real person in language I could understand. I wanted a book that sounded like a good friend wrote it.

You need a nontraditional book

I wrote this book to resemble a conversation, from someone who made it to the top of the mountain and is reaching back to help others make it to the top, too. A conversation, like I’m talking to you right now. The chapters are brief, easy to read, and loaded with tips—useful things I learned along the way that you might be able to use. Many chapters provide examples and simple illustrations of how to accomplish tasks, step by step.

The chapters of this book are arranged by issues that might be holding you back, okay, call them problems. Obstacles. Whatever. I am referring to the reasons that may be holding you back from getting your proposal approved, whether it’s how to use Word to set up a Table of Contents or how to choose your theoretical foundation. You can find specific guidance and direction in each “Reason,” aimed directly at helping you solve that problem so you can get on with writing and submitting your proposal.

Before you know it, you’ll have your approval and be moving on to the fun adventure of collecting data!

The book is called Resubmit: 28 ½ reasons why you can’t get your dissertation proposal approved and you can find it on Amazon for $29.99. The Kindle version is $9.99.

To purchase the print book and receive 20% off your order,
visit the Amazon CreateSpace estore
use discount code J49BZ39R

This discount is good through March 1, 2017

The literature review: 8 tips to fix the dirty red underbelly of your dissertation proposal

Somewhere in your dissertation proposal, you will be required to provide a lengthy, detailed discussion of what other researchers have written on your topic. Usually, that discussion is the Literature Review, which constitutes the entirety of Chapter 2 in your dissertation proposal.

I’m guessing you are tediously familiar with the process of writing research papers. That’s what the literature review is, essentially—a long and gruesomely detailed research paper. (If you don’t like doing research and writing, I’m sorry. Maybe now is the time to rethink your decision to enter graduate school. Oh dear, too late!)

I’ve seen my share of literature reviews. Some are good, others, not so much. Some reviews seem to be a fruit-basket-upset of everything ever published on a topic, no matter who wrote it (can you say Wikipedia?). Some dissertators seem to use no structure or outline, meandering through the extant literature like a drunkard in a field of daisies. Not only is this approach boring and confusing for the reader, but it also fails to fulfill the purpose of the literature review, which is to convince readers of the viability of your research problem.

What is a literature review?

The literature review is an in-depth synthesis of strategically chosen discussions presented by previous researchers about a topic, objectively examined from all sides with the aim of convincing your reviewers that there is a need for your study. Let’s unpack that bit by bit.

A literature review is a synthesis…

First, what is a synthesis? The word might remind you of the word synthetic, which has come to mean manufactured, artificial, or fake, like synthetic fur or motor oil. That is not how we are interpreting synthesis. You know how a tapestry weaves together threads of different textures and colors? That is a synthesis of thread. You know how when you make chocolate chip cookies, you mix some flour, some sugar, a couple eggs, some chocolate …? That is a synthesis of ingredients to create something yummy. A synthesis is simply a combining of elements—in our case, ideas.

A literature review is a strategic synthesis…

Even if it is “exhaustive,” your literature review is not just a random mishmash of everything under the sun. Instead, you should strategically choose what to include and exclude. I can hear you say, strategically? What is that all about, Dr. Carol?

Take a step back for a minute. What is your ultimate goal? To earn your Ph.D.? Okay. What do you need to do to get there? Finish your proposal and get it approved so you can start collecting data, right? What do you need to do before you do that? Convince your reviewers that you have a proposal that deserves to be approved!

Strategic means all your choices are designed to move you closer to the goal of getting approval. Any element of your literature review (or any other part of your proposal, for that matter) that doesn’t support that goal should be ruthlessly cut away. Your literature review is a strategic discussion of your topic.

Strategic also relates to the fact that you will be required to revisit the research you write about in Chapter 2 when you discuss your findings in Chapter 5. After data collection and analysis, as you write your report, you must place your findings in the context of past research: In other words, did your findings confirm or disconfirm what other researchers have found? How does your study’s findings relate to what has come before?

To answer these questions, you need to find the direct line between the research you discussed in Chapter 2 and your own study’s problem, purpose, theory, methodology, and methods. Thus, your literature review is the foundation of your study—its raison d’être, as it were—and it breathes life into your data when you get to Chapter 5. Without the context of your literature review, how will we know if your findings are meaningful?

A literature review is a strategic synthesis that shows the need for your study

The ultimate purpose of the literature review is to show the need for your study. In fact, your entire proposal is a sales pitch for your study. The literature review gives the reader the background and rationale leading up to the problem you identified. It’s your body of evidence, your proof that the problem is worth studying.

Imagine you are at a dinner party with your family and your annoying cousin asks, “Hey, what is your dissertation about?” And you say, “I think teachers need to do a better job.” Your cousin says, “Whoa, cool, and then asks you that important question: “How do you know there is a problem?”

A literature review is a strategic synthesis that shows the need for your study from other researchers’ points of view

The literature review answers the question, How do you know there’s a problem? You can’t just follow your instinct to yell at your cousin: “Trust me, I just know!” You might know a lot, but what you know is irrelevant for your literature review. Chapter 2 isn’t about what you know. It’s about what other people know. I’m referring to all those researchers whose shoulders you and I are standing on—yeah, those guys. Safety in numbers, people. Cite all those giants, big and small, because they provide the rationale for your study. If Famous Authors A and B claimed that teachers need to do a better job, then readers will be more inclined to take their claim seriously—more inclined than if you, Unknown Doctoral Candidate, made the claim.

A literature review is a strategic synthesis that shows the need for your study from other researchers’ points of view, not yours

I often see dissertators stating their opinions and offering recommendations and solutions to the so-called problem, right there in the literature review. The literature review is not the place to spout your opinions! If you already know the solution to the problem, then why bother doing your study? What’s there to learn?

The review should be about other researchers’ opinions, findings, and conclusions. You’ll get your turn in Chapter 5. For now, in Chapter 2, you are the emcee, not the performer. Your job is to combine all the voices you have gleaned from the mountains of research you’ve read and synthesize those voices into the story of your proposed study. Be a detective. Be a scribe. Stay off the soapbox.

However, keep in mind, the literature review is not an annotated bibliography, although the literature reviews in many proposals and dissertations seem to be organized that way (and I have to presume that many of these dissertators eventually obtain approvals). Some dissertators diligently discuss a study, followed by another study, followed by another, and another, and rarely bother to tie the discussions together in any meaningful way. What is the reader supposed to glean from this piecemeal listing of studies?

Sadly, many dissertators expect a lot from their readers, sometimes even including the chore of discerning the point of the entire literature review. Your average reader might put up with such a muddled approach, but most reviewers won’t, I guarantee you. If you don’t lead them through your literature review and point out the conclusions you want them to make along the way, then don’t expect them to do that work for you.

8 tips for your literature review success

1. Use a logical structure

Most successful dissertators start Chapter 2 with an introduction, explain how they searched for sources, and then present their review, organized by topic in some logical fashion. I’ve seen many variations, but this structure seems to work the best. When I say best, I mean the one that most effectively lays out the background, leads the reader through the discussion, and persuades the reader of the need for the study. The literature review should be carefully constructed to convince the reader, point by point, that there is a problem that needs studying.

2. Write from an outline

I know you probably dislike writing from an outline, but I encourage you to do it! Your entire proposal writing process will flow more smoothly if you have your roadmap (your outline) clearly before you. Boring? Hey, a dissertation is not a creative writing project! Stay in the herd until you get your degree—then you can blaze your own trail, literarily speaking. Remember, writing your literature review is an iterative process. Keep working at your outline until it makes sense. Tie your citations to your outline.

3. Define your variables and key terms

Some variables are difficult to define, but you need to present your reader with working definitions of all variables. Are you studying academic quality? Identify how others have defined it, and cite the sources. Are you using acronyms or abbreviations to stand for more complex concepts? Identify them and define them briefly in the introduction, even if they are defined in a list of key terms elsewhere in your paper.

4. Use terms consistently

Dissertators often fail to use terms consistently throughout the proposal. It’s so common, I even made an autotext snippet that I can insert into my editor’s notes, so I don’t have to keep typing the same cautions and recommendations over and over. It’s such a simple thing, but I understand why it happens. It’s easy to forget what terms you used when many weeks or months may pass between writing and submitting your chapters.

In addition, writers get bored with their own words—after you’ve read the same pages a billion times, you don’t even see the words anymore, you recall them from memory. Your eyes skip right past the things an editor would catch, like, for example, how in Chapter 1, you called your survey “Teachers Attitude Performance Questionnaire” (TAPQ), and in Chapter 3, you called it “Teachers Performance Attitude Survey” (TPAS). Readers are easily confused by changes in terms. Especially if you introduced the instrument in Chapter 2 and wrote that the originators of the survey called it the “Academic Satisfaction, Attitude, and Performance Test”! What is your poor reader to think?

5. Cite your sources

Many dissertators seem to start typing at the top of the chapter and pound away until they get to the end, inserting few if any citations along the way to support their statements. All the facts, claims, assertions, statistics, opinions … If you read it or heard it somewhere, you must cite the source. Most literature reviews have too few citations. Sometimes, though, a dissertator will pile on the citations to support a noncontroversial statement, like 10,000 children attended kindergarten last year, followed by five sources packed into one bulging set of parentheses. Really? Who is going to argue? Save your big guns (multiple citations) for the controversial statements that other researchers may feel compelled to debate. If you are confused about where and when to cite, see REASON 22 in my book.

See my previous rant on plagiarism.

6. Be objective

Your literature review should be an objectively presented view of all sides of the research problem. Strategically choosing sources means you may choose to include some sources but not others. This is okay. You want to include the sources that support the need for your study. However, you will run into trouble if you only include the research that supports your position and ignore the research that detracts from your position. Show that you understand all facets of the topic by presenting an objective and thorough literature review.

7. Look for the tension

Most likely, you will need to introduce and discuss one or more theories. Presenting an objective 360° view of the research means presenting arguments for and against each theory. Debate over theory among academics can be tense. Have you ever read articles by disgruntled academics defending their precious survey instruments? Back and forth, from one journal article to the next, they rave about obscure statistical procedures that prove their points, just barely refraining from calling each other incompetent boobs. They can really set fire to the publishing airwaves. This is good; seek out this tension and explain the controversies for your readers.

8. Update your literature review before you submit your proposal.

I had to make sure at least 85% of my sources were from peer-reviewed sources published within the previous five years. Because my entire Ph.D. program took me eight years to complete, some of my sources were getting a bit ripe toward the end of my program. I’ve seen dissertators in the education field only cite sources older than ten years—talk about ripe! Time moves on, events happen, new laws are enacted. Don’t rant about the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 without addressing recent changes to the law. I know it’s a pain to update Chapter 2 after you’ve got it precariously nailed together, but I encourage you to be a good scholar and update your sources periodically. Maybe if you are an art historian, citing only hundred-year-old sources is de rigueur, but in the social sciences, you destroy the credibility of your study if you don’t cite current facts.

The literature review: You gotta have it

You might dread the literature review as the swampy quagmire of your dissertation proposal, something to be slogged through once, in hip-high waders, and left behind. Unfortunately, you must have a literature review, in one shape or another, so you might as well do your best to help it fulfill its purpose, which is to persuade your reviewers to approve your dissertation proposal.

If you need help with other things, like managing your sources, citing your sources, or using Microsoft Word to format your paper, check out my book 28 ½ Reasons Why You Can’t Get Your Dissertation Proposal Approved. Maybe I can help.

Print book

Kindle book

Verified by MonsterInsights