You use theory, I use theory, we all use theory

(Excerpt from my new book Applying Theory, Chapter 1)

How I used theory today—Scenario 1

Today was a day much like any other. I woke with my cat sitting on my chest. My first thought was, why does he always do that? To answer my question, I tried to come up with some possible explanations.

  • He’s out of food.
  • He’s bored.
  • He barfed and felt an urgent need to notify me so I can fulfill my duty to clean it up.

I began to test each explanation. Moving gingerly toward the kitchen, I checked all nearby rugs but found no barf or hairballs. Okay, so that couldn’t explain his behavior. Next, I checked his bowl: He had plenty of kibbles, so that wasn’t the reason for his behavior. Of my three possible explanations, the one that made sense was he was bored.

However, it is possible my cat knows that if I don’t get up by a certain hour I feel like such a slacker I am likely to bury my head under the covers for a couple more hours to avoid facing the day. My cat could be smart like that. If you have a cat, you know what I mean. Maybe he’s trying to tell me something. I made a mental note to consult a cat whisperer.

Can you guess what was I doing in that scenario? I was generating and testing theory! I asked questions, and my brain offered some possible explanations, which I could then test to discern the best answer for the question.

How I used theory today—Scenario 2

Here’s another scenario. As I waited for the teakettle to boil, I noticed it seemed chilly in the kitchen, especially around my feet. Why was it so cold? My mind immediately conjured several possible explanations.

  • Cold air settles near the floor.
  • The east wind blowing against the side of the house could have sucked all the warmth out of the room.
  • The thermostat could be broken again.

Which explanation was correct? First, the air under the ceiling was likely warmer, compared to the air around my feet. The evidence I have for that explanation is my cat’s preference for sleeping on the top of his six-foot tall cat tree on cold days.

If this explanation was correct, what could I do about cold air settling by my feet? I couldn’t easily build a similar structure for myself (I’m way too old to climb trees, indoors or out), but maybe I could run a fan to circulate the air in the kitchen . . . so that the air was uniformly cold on my entire body, not just on my feet. Right, great solution.

What about that east wind? What could I do if that was the explanation? I couldn’t stop the wind from blowing, but I could put plastic over the windows to help block the cold drafts that seeped around and through the glass. Okay, done.

Finally, I could check the thermostat to make sure it was working properly. If it was, I could crank it up, never mind the heating bills. If the thermostat wasn’t working, I could call the property managers. Alternatively, I could put on more layers (too many as it is) or I could do jumping jacks to warm up (unlikely).

Again, I was generating and testing theory. I asked questions, and my brain offered some possible explanations, which I could then test to discern the best answer for the question.

How about that! Two theories generated before I even had my tea! Thus the day goes.

What about academic theory?

Not all researchers would consider these explanations academic theories. I admit, I am using the term theory in an everyday sense. As you will see, theory comes in many sizes, from micro to macro, from practical to abstract. Trying to conjure reasons why my cat behaves the way he does is an example of a microtheory, interesting only to me. I could expand the question to encompass all cat behavior; that would be moving toward a macro theory. If I were ambitious (which I’m not), I could use my cat’s behavior to try to generate an all-encompassing macrotheory of everything. Right, wish me luck with that.

Think about the links between observation, question, explanation, research, and practice. All five elements connect to create the knowledge base we need to solve problems. However, notice that embedded in our theoretical musings are our cultural circumstances—in my case, single, middle-aged White American female with one cat. Whatever theories we may derive in our academic research will inevitably reflect our cultural identities, as well as those of our readers (DiMaggio, 1995).

Cultural background notwithstanding, I hope you can see that we all use theory, big and small, all the time. I wrote Applying Theory to help you be conscious about it, so you can apply theory like a scholar, finish your dissertation, and earn your degree.

How did you use theory today?

References

DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on “What theory is not.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 391–397. doi:10.2307/2393790

 

Applying Theory

LYD-Applying Theory cover

Dissertators often struggle to choose and apply a theoretical framework to their research projects. In this helpful guide, I offer suggestions from my own experience. In addition, I reveal how other dissertators have applied theory successfully and earned their doctorates.

Written in a friendly, nonscholarly manner, I demystify the challenges of applying academic theory to a research project. You will learn that theory is nothing to fear—in fact, we all use theory all the time! With the help of this powerful little book, you will learn to master theory and achieve your dream of earning your Ph.D.  Learn more.

Print version 

 

Resubmit! 28 ½ Reasons Why You Can’t Get Your Dissertation Proposal Approved

This comprehensive book is the missing link for dissertators who have struggled to get their proposals approved. This indispensable book bulges with insights, suggestions, examples, diagrams, and practical tips, written especially for the online dissertator who may receive little support during the proposal process.

I present solutions to address twenty-eight potential reasons why you might be struggling to get your proposal approved. For example, you will learn how to write a clear problem statement, devise research questions and hypotheses, and align the elements of the proposal to facilitate speedy approval. I unlock the mysteries of Word and Excel to show you specifically how to use these tools for your proposals. Over 200 tables and figures show you exactly what to do. As a bonus, you will learn how to design a web-based survey and make a plan for fielding and analyzing the data. In this book, I cover it all to help you overcome obstacles and finish your dissertation. Learn more.

Free templates and worksheets are available here.

Print version
Kindle version

Are you ready to turn your dissertation into a journal article?

Even if you haven’t finished your doctoral research and manuscript—in fact, even if you haven’t started yet—it is not too soon to think strategically about the journal articles that could emerge from your dissertation.

If you attend(ed) a traditional (by traditional I mean a public or private nonprofit) university, you probably already know that you need to publish your research in journals, the sooner (and more reputable) the better.

As a nontraditional dissertator at an online for-profit university, I did not know this. I received no guidance on how to position my research strategically for my future academic career. I now know I was fortunate simply to have a Chair who gave me good feedback and didn’t disappear halfway to the finish line. I’ve since learned, somewhat resentfully, that dissertators at traditional universities often publish articles long before they get to their oral defense.

The dissertation and doctoral degree are not the end of our academic career—they are just the beginning. The dissertation we deliver to the world is a repository of data and knowledge we mine in subsequent months and years to reap the rewards of our long laborious hours of research and writing. No matter what type of institution we attend or attended, we need to publish. But should we convert our dissertation into a book? Journal articles? Or both?

Publish as a book or as a journal article—or both

Printing and binding your dissertation  may make it look like a book, but this is not what academic experts mean when they suggest you publish in book form. Publishing your dissertation in book form is an intentional process, planned before you start writing. For example, some traditional dissertators earn degrees in fields in which their dissertations become textbooks. They pitch their projects to publishers long before they start collecting data, sometimes even before their proposals are approved. They plan their projects with their undergraduate audiences (and prospective publishers) in mind.

Intentionally positioning my dissertation as a future textbook never entered my consciousness (and I’m pretty sure it would not have happened unintentionally, given my lack of expertise as a novice researcher). Most of us nontraditional dissertators will struggle through to the finish line and wake up a couple years later wondering what we can do to pummel our dissertation into some sort of shape that could earn us some money to pay back our student loans.

Your dissertation may not translate easily into a book, and that is a topic for another day. However, I have no doubt you can get at least two journal articles from your massive tome, maybe more. Journal articles are typically short, focusing on one aspect of the research study, adhering to a specific structure, and targeting a wider audience than your dissertation would likely reach.

Four steps to publishing a journal article

Four steps: Choose a journal. Figure out the focus of your article. Write it according to the journal’s guidelines, and submit it. Voila. It’s (almost) that simple. Then prepare to wait. Before you start writing a journal article, read all four of my recommended steps, because like a lot of academic writing, this is an iterative process. (That means we often have to run in circles, sweating and grunting and maybe flapping our arms a little bit, before we end up at our destination.)

1. Choose a journal

If you have been at this scholarly thing for a while, you no doubt know thousands of academic journals exist, online and in print. You probably already know some are better than others. Some subscriptions cost a small fortune for a densely written quarterly than can’t bend to fit in your mailbox. Others exist only online, in the Wild, Wild West of academic publishing where anything goes and articles might not even be given issue numbers, let alone volume numbers. Some are in English, some not so much. Some are riddled with typos, formatting faux pas, and unsupported statements that scream not peer-reviewed. You must be careful when you seek prospective journals.

Go back through your dissertation references and make a list of articles that were useful to you. Which seemed the most reputable? Were the authors affiliated with respectable schools? Read what the online world has to say about the journal and its publisher. Look at their websites. Peruse the author submission guidelines. Here’s a hint: If they want you to pay a fee to submit or to publish, strike them from your list of potential journals. You will not be paid for your article, but neither should you pay. Find the journals that have strong peer-review procedures. Aim for top-tier journals in your field, but don’t turn up your nose at second- and third-tier journals. We all start somewhere.

After you have a list of five to ten possible journals, jump to step 2 and find the focuses of your first two articles. Then come back here to step 1 and narrow down your choice to journals that seem like the best fit for your ideas. (Remember, we don’t submit a manuscript to more than one journal at a time.) Start with a top-tier journal. Maybe you will receive a revise-and-resubmit. Awesome! If the reviewers reject your article, revise based on their feedback (if you receive any feedback), and try another journal.

2. Find the focus

I’ve edited a number of life sciences dissertations that were organized into three journal articles, each focused on one aspect of the research project. This format is not the norm in social science fields like business, education, and psychology, in which most dissertators follow a traditional five chapter format. However, if you are required to follow the three-article format, you are home free in the article-submission race. You write your dissertation with the goal of submission in mind, submit your three chapters, and bing bang boom (tech-speak for winning!), you are published.

If not, however, no worries. You can extract at least two articles from your dissertation, no matter what format it follows. The first one will focus on some aspect of the topic. The second will focus on the methodology. Here’s my story.

Topic. My topic was academic quality in for-profit colleges, so logically, my first article focused on that topic. However, when I tried to convert my massive tome to an article, I bogged down to my eyebrows in data. With a firm 7,000-word limit set by the journal I sought, how could I convey the nuances of my findings, plus include a brief introduction, literature review, and list of references? I quickly became overwhelmed.

Finally, after some pondering, I realized that I could report one set of responses regarding one group and draw reasonable conclusions about that one group. Maybe someday I will write about the other groups and themes that emerged. For this first article, I reported what faculty members thought owners and administrators of vocational colleges should do to improve academic quality at their schools. I guess it worked, because after a round of revisions, the article was published by a reputable journal.

Method. My second article, in review now for about a billion years, focused on methodology. In my dissertation, I used rich pictures to gather faculty perceptions of academic quality. I thought, hmm, rich pictures is visually appealing, just the type of research a not-too-fancy online journal might be happy to publish. My submission hasn’t been rejected yet, so we’ll see.

It was hard at first to shift my focus from writing about the conclusions of my research (topic) to writing about the actual process of the research (method), but once I found the angle, I saw other possibilities related to methodology—for example, recruiting hard-to-access participant populations and using web surveys to collect demographic data—that could become future articles.

3. Write the article

Once you have the focus of the article, the rest is just a matter of cramming it all into the format required by the journal to which you plan to submit. Don’t make the mistake of writing your article before you know what journal might accept it. Waste of time. Keep the journal requirements in mind while you write.

Many journals in the social sciences refer authors to the guidelines in the American Psychology Association (APA) Publication Manual. Pay attention to formatting guidelines and word limits. If you have tables and figures, make sure you place them where the journal wants them, with appropriate captions. Be aware of the rules about submitting your name and contact information. (For example, please do not add your name in a running head).

In short, read the journal’s submission requirements and follow them carefully. Don’t give them any reason to reject you before they have had a chance to read your scintillating prose.

4. Submit the article to the journal

Submission usually happens online and involves creating an account with the journal, submitting your Word or pdf file, and then waiting. I hear three months is typical. If you don’t hear something in a month, send an email to the editor, asking for an update.

If you receive an invitation to revise and resubmit, that is great news. You will most likely receive feedback from several reviewers. You can take or leave what they suggest (I suggest you take their suggestions seriously). They will have some valuable questions and insights that will make your work stronger. If something was confusing to them, it will confuse your eventual readers. We don’t want that. So do your best to follow their recommendations. Then resubmit. After a while, you’ll see a proof of your document, with many comments from the publisher’s proofreader, catching the embarrassing typos and citation errors you didn’t.

Eventually, you’ll sign a document giving the publisher the rights to your article, and next thing you know, you’re published. You can add the doi to your CV and email your mom and everything. If you went to a traditional university, you’ve already done this a few times, old news for you, moving on. However, if you went to a nontraditional university, like me, this is a little moment to celebrate before taking a deep breath and doing it all over again. And again.

You can do it

You worked hard on your dissertation… or you are working hard… or you will work hard, if you aren’t done yet. Whatever stage you have achieved in your doctoral journey, you owe it to yourself—you owe it to the world—to bring your findings to the larger community. If you were strategic (and went to the right schools), you likely planned your publishing career before you ever wrote a word of your dissertation. For those of us who are a bit late to the party, don’t worry, we’ll catch up.

================================================

If you are at the proposal stage and running into some obstacles, maybe I can help. Check out my book.

Print version
Kindle version 

Verified by MonsterInsights